Presence Phobia Money

By the way, the snake phobia is the fear ofidiofobia and insects, entomofobia. There are plenty of eager living in fear of ruin or be ruined: who should behave well being diagnosed atefobia, fear of ruin. And if your fear is to weapons he will have to be congratulated for their common sense (how have you no fear of weapons?) And a name for his aversion: balistofobia, fear of weapons and ammunition. Common sense is also the cancerophobia or carcinofobia: fear of cancer disease for which medical science still must win the most important battles. The claustrophobia and xenophobia are two of the most popular fears.

In the first case, the fear of enclosed spaces and in the second, anti-foreigner. The claustrophobic should refrain to go to small rooms, dark and closed tunnels, corridors or rooms without windows and, of course, should avoid custodial sentences explaining that the latter recommendation applies to all mortals even if they are of sound mind, free from all phobias. Who suffers from xenophobia must do everything possible to heal, because of globalization, present today in all places and at all hours, imposes on us the need to live and interact with nationals of various countries, cooperate, join them, help them and, conversely, receive cooperation, support and help from them. Xenophobia became, therefore, not only harmful and unnecessary, but also completely anachronistic. It is not certain that there is someone with this illness but, if ever, mentioned the cibofobia, fear of food and crometofobia, fear of money (I have not yet found the first little patient of this disease) or touch the money, rare disease recommended for employees of institutions of the financial system. Not know if they have had to do with the lake increasing volume of transactions which do not require the presence of paper money and the increasingly frequent use of so-called plastic money. There are so many phobias sufisciente not space in this column to detail all. And since there are still many for which there has been coined the term precisely.

A friend to whom I gave a reading of the draft text said, "you are missing the most important phobia." What I asked? "Phobia that damn sport, football, women have their fault we were widows when they pass the game on TV, you must include the futbolfobia, he said" The truth my research to find the little word suggested by my friend have been completely unsuccessful. At best I found futbolmania, behavior that is not enough to be considered a fear but an addiction and would become the opposite of what women suffer. Then accept, as we find a word more appropriate to designate futbolfobia anger, rejection, terror football. In the future can determine whether it is more dangerous or futbolfobia futbolmania. I do not think it easy to discover the cure for either, and when it is hopefully not a drug to be applied through a hypodermic injection because it was proven that futbolmaniacos, including this writer, tend to suffer as well belenofobia , ie, fear of needles. Well, I think at this point is better to finish not to run the risk of causing the kind readers bored to the point that someone will take a phobia of phobia. In this case we have to diagnose it as a victim of fobofobia, or phobia of phobias.


In the market many models of performance evaluation exist and softers that they mensuram the performance of the individual, they generate statisticians, they suggest gaps of abilities at last, generates information concerning this individual. With this, the professional in management of people must have conscience that has the necessity of accomplishment of a preliminary work before the choice of the model, the methodology and the instrument of evaluation and not be hostage the modismos taxes for the market. We know that each individual has its idiosyncrasies, that is, possess its proper way to see, to feel and to think the things. Moreover, also they possess its values and personality. That is a complicador factor in the elaboration of a system of performance evaluation, therefore we come across in them with the subjectivity. On the other hand we have the Organizations, we can infer that they (the organizations), also possess its idiosyncrasies, its personality (represented for its culture) and its values. These aspects are important, must be observed in implantation of a system of performance evaluation and points with respect to the necessity to relativize and to analyze the context which we are considering to make an implantation of a system of performance evaluation. In face to the displayed one, I call the attention for two great sources that must be considered and be analyzed more deeply before the implantation of a system of performance evaluation: the subjectivity of the appraiser and the organizacional culture which the appraiser and the evaluated one are inserted. The choice of the model, the methodology and the instrument must be thought of form to look for to minimize the subjectivity of the appraiser and to be in communion with the values, the objectives and the organizacional culture. The deriving results of this type of evaluation must be strategical for the Organization, mapear abilities, add value and retroalimentar the too much systems and/or subsystems of the organization with feedbacks with intention to promote improvements continuous of processes, otimizao of costs and identification of talentos.

The System

Relations of work perpassam the simple question of the convivncia, but yes in the determined relations daily pay, social status, social focus; a key for the success, professional and social ascension. We find here the apex of the study of the social identity with the work, therefore the study of psychology it must leave of the production relations, to recognize as the behavior is determined from these relations of production (Codo, 1994). As the individual obtains its quality of life, its mental hygiene, its mental health, as the same work feeds that me, me of the one social identity, me adoece, becomes me an unhappy person, without a existencial perspective, recognizing that the behavior of the man is determined by the society where lives without, however, if to reduce to that society (Codo, 1994). Therefore the system of the capital, the differentiation of the laboring classrooms, the division of the work, the division of the classrooms partners, which if reduces the social relations, the convivialities, that can limit or hinder the human behavior, generate alienation, reduce the possibility of a change, as Marx foresaw, the individual fighting against the forces of the capital, only individual against the system of the capital. Codo (1994), takes an analysis that: If the system generates alienation, does not need to have mentally ill laborers necessarily, because together with alienation the system generates revolt, the classroom exploration determines the development of a new conscience of classroom and the fight for a new social system. We must study of detailed form the human work, know as the production relations determine the behavior of the man and as it you being modified in accordance with the changes of market, technology and globalization, therefore according to Codo (1994): All occured change in the production relations aimed at frees the man of the yoke of the feudalismo and to become exempts it to vender its force of work.