These activities can be implemented as a form of physical containment of shareholders and their representatives, and in the form of a formal legal pretext to deprive shareholders of opportunities to attend the meeting. For example, law enforcement agencies in order to verify reports of crime requires shareholder and its representatives to appear for questioning. Also, the techniques of failure to notify shareholders about the upcoming corporate event, holding a general meeting of shareholders at the address specified in the notice, but in another room. 2. Initiating the audit company 1) inspections of public authorities Unfortunately, none of the corporate conflict is not without involvement in it of the state power.
Upon admission to the competent public authority of a complaint, even totally unfounded, the public authority is obliged to carry out appropriate checks. Thus, according to claim 1 of Article 9 of the Federal Law "On Order of consideration of citizens of the Russian Federation "from 02.05.2006g. 59-FZ of treatment received by the public authority, local authority or officer in accordance with their competence. In the implementation of measures to grinmeylu shareholders often have the right to defend their rights in an administrative procedure – to complain to state authorities. An indicative list of public authorities, which is likely to appeal shareholder, as follows: 1. The Federal Financial Markets Service (FFMS). This federal agency monitors compliance with legal requirements by the issuers of the Russian Federation on securities papers, standards and requirements approved by the federal executive body for the securities market.
Doing business – it is always a risk, and more than expected income, the greater the risk. Legal persons who have their services without payment, are often faced with the problem of debt collection. Partner may become debtors because of certain circumstances (crisis, emergencies). Often, small debt can pay their own delivery of services (offsets). So come in if the lender actually need the services debtors. If the scope of their business is different, or we are talking about different orders of the cost per unit, the recovery of debts can not be mutual.
Even more difficult to collect the debt from the company or entity, if they using special schemes for fraud, and debt had been scheduled. On debt, you as a director, you can do to make their subordinates. But they are not always qualified, and the plan can not succeed. In Currently, debt collection – one of the most frequently reschaemyh issues in arbitration. Entrust to write statements to the court and case management best professionals – lawyers or lawyers.
If you have a small firm, then content of the lawyer in the state can be expensive, and the successful recovery of the debt then becomes even more important, as every penny counts. In the collection of debts to court can not even be necessary if the lawyer correctly amount to a letter in which the company describes the essence of the case, its claims with reference to certain articles of the RF legislation. Debt Collection in Lipetsk – one of the most common problems, like any dynamic city. Solve it in the pretrial and trial procedures can easily at the law office. It is worth noting that to apply for debt recovery tribunal has meaning only if there are real objects of property or money money with which to pay debts.