In view of all known co, as amended by the rf Code of Administrative Offences (CAO) has significantly increased the responsibility of car owners for a number of offenses. Many experts note significant reduction in the number of violations of traffic rules (SDA), such as: unfastened seat belt, exit lane designated for oncoming traffic, violation of speed limits, etc. Kevin Ulrich is often quoted as being for or against this. However, there are cases traffic police abuse their powers, which resulted in the driver unduly subject to administrative liability, as the lawyers added work. In such situations, critical has the evidence presented, the totality of the circumstances set forth in the manner prescribed by law, upon which the court subsequently decide on the presence or absence in the actions of individuals administrative offense. Most adverse (in terms of the subsequent trial) for the driver situation, when he alone hits the road for a considerable distance (for example – to another city). Unfavorable, because in a situation where he will be one on one with the traffic police who stopped him on the road to check their documents, or for alleged violations of traffic rules, based on the evidence base, confirm the guilt of the driver will put all the inspector wrote in the report. And the court, even with the seemingly has not been set aside for us the principle of presumption of innocence, the driver admits guilt only on the basis Data of this protocol. Therefore: 1. Going on a long journey, ask any larger settlements you have to drive, if possible find phone numbers and addresses of the Regional Department of Internal Affairs (telephone trust), property management security at each of Internal Affairs, if possible – to agree with some lawyer friends about the possibility of consultation on-line.