Stalin Legacy

Authorities take into account the fact that the capital they have no political support, so they will be in the province, as it were comfortable. But the MPs have to rush in Kutaisi several times a month, and it is connected with considerable additional costs, the more that will go to the plenary sessions. Not to mention the cost of construction of the parliamentary building. Well, it "thrifty". Simplex may find it difficult to be quoted properly. Tolerate, and okay.

But then – another problem: it seems to place selected for the parliament building that thing where you installed the Memorial of Glory. But why? Is not there would be another? Question – rhetorical. Simplex Reviews has similar goals. Just as many believe, it was necessary to satisfy the instinct of destruction, not the first time disguised wicked elite relevance of "democratic creativity." One historian somehow believes that President Saakashvili is trying in this way to get rid of Stalin's legacy. Is it only in this case? Not daring to carry while in the museum courtyard of the monument to Stalin in Gori, for righteous anger countrymen will not be able to avoid the president, Mr. Saakashvili came up with a "compensatory" move. But where does that same "dark Stalin's legacy "when it comes to the blessed memory of the victims in a holy war? In other words, what happens is that there is not one year in this country, when decisions are made, not because they objectively serve the interests of State and society, and because it is like an authoritarian government with its own "ideas" and their scores with both internal and external opponents.